← Back

regulation

Tether Sued Over Blacklisted USDT and Seizure Warrant Discrepancy

Two Thai businessmen are suing Tether in Manhattan federal court over USDT tokens that were blacklisted and frozen prior to the issuance of a seizure warrant. The case highlights issues of asset control and legal procedures in crypto.

AS1 NewsSource: thedefiant.io

tetherusdtblockchainregulationsecurityonchainlaw
USDT$0.9997-0.01%ETH$2,518.56+1.65%

Two Thai businessmen have filed a lawsuit against Tether in the Southern District of New York, alleging that the stablecoin issuer blacklisted and froze over 42 million USDT across ten Ethereum addresses. On-chain records indicate that all ten addresses were frozen in a single batch lasting approximately two and a half minutes on October 30, 2025. Interestingly, the seizure warrant cited in the complaint is dated February 19, 2026, suggesting a potential discrepancy between the legal order and the on-chain freezing activity.

The lawsuit, filed on August 31 and re-filed the following day, raises questions about the timing and authority of asset freezes in the crypto space. Tether's actions, as described, involved preemptive freezing of tokens before the official seizure warrant was issued, which could have implications for legal procedures and asset rights in blockchain transactions.

This case underscores ongoing challenges in the regulation and security of digital assets, especially regarding the enforcement of legal orders against crypto addresses. It also highlights the evolving landscape of crypto law, where on-chain activity and traditional legal processes intersect.

The outcome of this lawsuit may influence future practices around asset freezing and seizure in the crypto industry, emphasizing the importance of clear legal frameworks and transparent procedures.

neutral

The case involves the legal and procedural aspects of asset freezing in crypto, with potential implications for regulatory practices and asset rights.